Coffey v. Foxall et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until June 1, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice; and The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 1, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ROBERT COFFEY, Plaintiff, v. MARK FOXALL, Director Assistant, ADAMS, C.O., and NEWTON, Director, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:10CV16

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On March 25, 2010, the Clerk of the court sent a Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff at his last known address. (Filing No. 8.) On March 31, 2010, that document was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 9.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff's whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintif f shall have until June 1, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice; and The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 1, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address.

2.

DATED this 30th day of April, 2010. BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S.
District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.