Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Filing 76

ORDER adopting 75 Joint Stipulation. Defendant's deadline to file a reply brief responding to the brief filed by plaintiffs in opposition to UP's motion for leave to file an amended answer is continued to January 10, 2011. The deadline for all parties to respond to all of the other parties outstanding discovery and requests for admissions is continued until thirty days after the date on which the Court rules on the motions for summary judgment. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAB)

Download PDF
Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al Doc. 76 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA AMLIN CORPORATE INSURANCE N.V. and CG POWER SYSTEMS CANADA, INC., ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) 8:10CV31 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the joint stipulation regarding timing of Union Pacific Railroad Company's filing of its reply brief and a continuation of the date for the parties to respond to outstanding discovery (Filing No. 75). Court finds the stipulation should be approved and adopted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's deadline to file a reply brief responding to the brief filed by plaintiffs in opposition to UP's motion for leave to file an amended answer is continued to January 10, 2011. 2) The deadline for all parties to respond to all of the other parties' outstanding discovery and requests for The Dockets.Justia.com admissions is continued until thirty days after the date on which the Court rules on the motions for summary judgment. DATED this 16th day of December, 2010. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom _____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?