United States of America v. $8,880.00 in United States Currency

Filing 23

ORDER upon notice of settlement, On or before January 10, 2011, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal and shall submit to Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case may be dismissed without further notice. The trial previously scheduled is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. ***Set All Deadlines: ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 1/10/2011.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Download PDF
United States of America v. $8,880.00 in United States Currency Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. $8,880.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant. STEPHANIE E. ANGULO and ANTHONY M. QUINTANA, Claimants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV36 ORDER Upon notice of settlement given to the undersigned magistrate judge on December 10, 2010, by counsel for the plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. On or before January 10, 2011, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken, at thalken@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. 2. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. 3. The trial previously scheduled is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. DATED this 10th day of December, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?