Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Progress Rail Services Corporation

Filing 280

ORDER that plaintiff's 272 Motion in Limine and 276 Motion in Limine are hereby consolidated; The Defendant's response to the Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Filing Nos. 272 and 276) must be filed on or before 12:00 noon on Wednesday, June 5, 2013; and Plaintiff's reply, if any, will be due on or before 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 6, 2013. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, 8:10CV38 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER PROGRESS RAIL SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the request for consolidation and expedited briefing made by Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Plaintiff”) in its Motion in Limine (Filing No. 276). Plaintiff filed Motions in Limine on May 29, 2013 (Filing No. 272), and May 30, 2013 (Filing No. 276). Union Pacific requests that the two Motions be consolidated and that the Court enter an expedited briefing schedule for responding to the Motions. The Court will grant this request, in part. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (Filing Nos. 272 and 276) are hereby consolidated; 2. The Defendant’s response to the Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (Filing Nos. 272 and 276) must be filed on or before 12:00 noon on Wednesday, June 5, 2013; and 3. Plaintiff’s reply, if any, will be due on or before 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 6, 2013. Dated this 31st day of May, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?