Rodgers v. Data Transmission Network et al

Filing 64

PROTECTIVE ORDER -Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

GLORIA RODGERS,

No. 8:10-cv-046

Plaintiff,
v.

PROTECTIVE ORDER

DATA TRANSMISSION NETWORK,
TELVENT, CHRIS WHITTINGHILL,
AMANDA MARSHALL and SHERI
WASHBURN,
Defendants.

Plaintiff Gloria Rodgers (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Data Transmission Network
(“DTN”), Chris Whittinghill and Sheri Washburn (collectively referred to herein as
“Defendants”) have filed a Joint Stipulation for Protective Order (filing 63). Having considered
the matter, the Court concludes that the Stipulation should be adopted.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that all documents and information described herein and produced by
Plaintiff, Defendants or any non-party are governed by the following:
1.

In this action, the parties have sought and are seeking Confidential Information

(as defined in Paragraph 2 below) during discovery. The parties further anticipate there will be
questioning concerning Confidential Information in the course of depositions. The parties assert
the disclosure of such information outside the scope of this litigation could result in significant
4817-6298-3692.1

injury to one or more of the parties’ business or private individual interests. The parties also
assert that the need for this Protective Order applies to any information, documents or materials
produced by a non-party as a result of discovery subpoenas or other requests. The parties have
stipulated agreement to this Protective Order and request the Court enter it for the purpose of
preventing the disclosure and use of Confidential Information by any party or non-party except
as set forth herein. The terms of this Protective Order shall apply to any information or materials
produced by any party or non-party as part of discovery in this action, including, but not limited
to, information or materials marked “Confidential,” already produced. Each and every attorney
with the law firms representing the parties in this case shall be deemed to be subject to this
Protective Order and shall be deemed to have actual knowledge of the restrictions herein.
2.

Under the terms of this Protective Order, “Confidential Information” means any

document, file, electronic material, portions of files, transcribed testimony or responses to
discovery requests, including any extract, abstract, chart, summary, note or copy made therefrom
and designated by one of the parties or a non-party in the manner provided in Paragraph 3 below
as containing or comprising confidential policies or procedures, proprietary business or financial
information, or information pertaining to individuals outside of Plaintiff that were or are
employed by DTN or a non-party, the release of which would harm the business interests or
private individual interests or otherwise embarrass or invade the privacy of the designating party.
Such documents, information or materials may be so designated as Confidential only if they are
not otherwise publicly available.

A producing non-party shall have the same rights and

obligations as a party with regard to such documents, information or things.
3.

Where any kind of Confidential Information is produced, provided or otherwise

disclosed in this action in response to any discovery request or subpoena, including by means of
4817-6298-3692.1

2

entry onto land or premises or by inspection of books, records, documents or tangible things,
such Confidential Information will be designated by stamping as “CONFIDENTIAL” the
documents that will be covered by this Order, and such stamp shall be preserved on the copies of
such documents, including, but not limited to, pages of any deposition transcript or exhibit which
discloses or discusses the protected information as well as documents provided by Plaintiff or
Defendants to the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission (“NEOC”) or the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) in connection with Plaintiff’s charge of
discrimination against DTN.
4.

For documents previously provided by Plaintiff or Defendants to the NEOC or

EEOC that may now be in the possession of the opposing party, the parties agree that the
producing party shall identify in writing all such documents she/they contends contain
Confidential Information. Upon receipt of written identification, the opposing party will either
stamp the identified documents and all copies thereof as confidential, or return them, including
all copies, to the producing party to mark as confidential. If the opposing party elects for the
producing party to mark the documents identified as confidential, the producing party agrees to
promptly return the stamped documents to the opposing party. In the event a party elects to mark
the documents identified by the producing party as confidential, within 15 days of receipt of the
producing party’s written request identifying such confidential documents, the party will provide
the opposing party a letter certifying that said documents and all copies have been so marked.
5.

This Stipulation for Protective Order shall be without prejudice to the right of any

of the parties to this action (i) to seek any further Protective Order; or (ii) by application and
notice, to seek relief from any provision of this Stipulation for Protective Order and the
Protective Order contemplated hereby on any ground. During the pendency of any challenge to
4817-6298-3692.1

3

the applicability of this Stipulation for Protective Order to any document, information or thing,
however, said document, information or thing shall remain subject to the provisions of this
Stipulation for Protective Order and the Protective Order contemplated hereby.
6.

Any Confidential Information shall be treated as confidential by the parties, their

attorneys and persons assisting their attorneys. The parties’ attorney will inform each person to
whom such Confidential Information is disclosed that such person is strictly forbidden by this
Order to disclose such Confidential Information under any circumstances. If any Confidential
Information covered by this Protective Order is used at a deposition or in any other proceeding in
this case, it shall be handled as confidential and maintained under seal from public view.
7.

Confidential Information:
(a)

Except as provided herein, shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the
Court and its staff, the parties hereto, their attorneys of record in this
litigation, and their employees who are assisting such attorneys in this
litigation, any in-house counsel, family members, court reporters who
record deposition or other testimony, witnesses, potential witnesses,
deponents, consultants and/or experts;

(b)

If any party, attorney or individual shall disclose Confidential Information
to a consultant, expert witness, potential witness or family member, it is
the obligation of the disclosing party to provide such person with a copy
of this Protective Order and obtain a signed Confidentiality Agreement (in
the form attached hereto and marked as Exhibit A) whereby such person
agrees to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order. A copy of each
executed Confidentiality Agreement shall be maintained by counsel for

4817-6298-3692.1

4

the disclosing party in a secure place and, upon request, shall produce the
same to counsel for the non-disclosing party.

If any party discloses

Confidential Information to an expert witness who is not expected to be
called as a witness at trial (“non-trial expert”), the disclosing party still has
the obligation to provide the non-trial expert with a copy of this Protective
Order and obtain a signed Confidentiality Agreement (in the form attached
hereto and marked as Exhibit A) whereby the non-trial expert agrees to be
bound by the terms of this Protective Order. Although a copy of each
executed Confidentiality Agreement obtained from such non-trial expert
shall be maintained by counsel for the disclosing party in a secure place, a
copy of said executed Confidentiality Agreement shall be produced to the
non-disclosing party only upon court order; and
(c)

If any person to whom disclosure is permitted under this Protective Order
is a nonparty witness or deponent who has not signed a Confidentiality
Agreement in the form attached as Exhibit A, then it is the obligation of
the disclosing party to ensure that such person is not permitted to retain or
make copies of any Confidential Information disclosed to such person,
whether such Confidential Information is contained in a deposition, brief,
pleading, affidavit or other form. It is the intent of the parties hereto that
Confidential Information not be used for any purpose outside the
reasonable conduct of this case.

8.

Confidential Information shall not be used or disclosed by the parties or their

attorneys, except as necessary for the prosecution of claims in this action, and in no event shall
4817-6298-3692.1

5

they be disclosed to any person who is neither a party nor a potential witness to this action nor
employed or consulted by a party’s attorneys to assist those attorneys in the preparation of this
case unless the Confidentiality Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A is signed by the person
receiving the disclosure. Subject to the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order, attorneys
who represent a party in this case may disclose such materials and information or the contents
thereof to secretaries, clerks and paralegals as necessary to assist those attorneys.
9.

In the event that any party uses any Confidential Information in connection with

any pretrial motion or at trial, such Confidential Information will not be made part of the public
record, and the Court shall not permit disclosure of any Confidential Information or any portion
thereof except as provided herein. Subject to the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order,
attorneys who represent a party in this case may disclose such Confidential Information or the
contents thereof to secretaries, clerks and paralegals as necessary to assist those attorneys.
10.

Should a party object to the designation of documents or materials as

Confidential, the objecting party shall, within 30 days, notify the opposing side’s attorneys in
writing of such objection. Failure by either side to object to the confidentiality designation
within the time prescribed will serve as a waiver of any subsequent objection. The parties shall
first try to dispose of such dispute in good faith on an informal basis. If the dispute cannot be
resolved informally, the party opposing the confidentiality of the information may apply for
appropriate relief from this Court, which may conduct an in camera inspection of the materials.
The party seeking confidentiality of this information shall have the burden of establishing that
the information is entitled to confidential treatment. If the challenging party fails to apply for
relief from the Court within 60 days from receipt of the confidential materials, the party will be

4817-6298-3692.1

6

considered to have abandoned its objection and will be estopped from any further assertion of the
same.
11.

Nothing contained in this Stipulated Protective Order shall be construed to

prejudice any party’s right to use at trial, or otherwise before the Court, any Confidential
Information protected by this Stipulated Protective Order, but any such Confidential Information
shall only be used, and its confidentiality protected, as determined and directed by the trial Court.
12.

Upon final determination of this action, including all appeals, each party must

destroy documents or materials containing Confidential Information or return it to the party or
non-party that produced it.
13.

This Court shall maintain its copies of the documents or materials containing

Confidential Information protected under this Stipulated Protective Order under seal and shall
not permit them to be inspected by the public.
14.

By approval of this Protective Order, counsel for the parties agree that the parties

and counsel for the parties are bound by the conditions of this Protective Order.
15.

Execution of this Protective Order does not constitute a waiver of any objections

raised by a party to the production of any documents or information even if such documents or
information are encompassed within this Protective Order.
16.

Counsel for Plaintiff has given counsel for Defendants permission to use his

electronic signature in filing this joint stipulation. See NECivR 11.1(a)(3)(A)(ii).

4817-6298-3692.1

7

DATED October 24, 2011.

BY THE COURT:
S/ F.A. Gossett
United States Magistrate Judge

4817-6298-3692.1

8

Exhibit A
CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he/she has read the Stipulation for Protective
Order and Protective Order dated October ___, 2011 entered by the United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska in the action entitled Gloria Rodgers v. Data Transmission Network,
Telvent, Chris Whittinghill, Amanda Marshall and Sheri Washburn, Case No. 8:10CV046, that
he/she understands the terms thereof and that he/she agrees to be bound by such terms.

Dated this _______ day of _________________________, 20___.

______________________________

4817-6298-3692.1

9