Edelstein et al v. Optimus Corporation
Filing
164
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES IN PROGRESSION ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The motion (#163) is granted and the following deadlinesshall apply to these proceedings as set forth in this order.Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (TCL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
STANLEY EDELSTEIN, IVAN GERARD,
PAT HOY, BARRY BLUE, ROBERT
CAMPNEY, GROVONDA COLEMAN,
WAYNE COREY, PETER DANIELSON,
WILLIAM GOLDMAN, DANA HAMIK,
MICHAEL HICKS, BILL KELLER,
RICHARD NEVINS, JOE SCHUETTE,
ROBERT SCHMIDT, CHRISTL UPCHURCH,
LORRAINE VASHON, TIM WHITTINGHILL,
and PACESETTER CORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED KEY
EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN.
Plaintiffs,
v.
OPTIMUS CORPORATION, formerly known
as THE PACESETTER CORPORATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 8:10-CV-00061
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO EXTEND DEADLINES IN
PROGRESSION ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Extend Deadlines in
Progression Order (#163). The request for an extension is unopposed and the parties have agreed
to the schedule contained in this Order. The Court finds that the extension is supported by good
cause and should be granted.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The motion (#163) is granted and the following deadlines
shall apply to these proceedings:
Date
Event
May 23, 2012
Plaintiff shall serve their statement of expert witnesses
pursuant to the provisions of Rule 702, 703 or 705 of the
Federal Rules of Evidence
June 22, 2012
Defendant shall serve its statement of expert witnesses
pursuant to Rule 702, 703 or 705 of the Federal Rules of
Evidence
July 16, 2012
Deadline to file motions for summary judgment
August 17, 2012
Deposition and discovery deadline
Dated this 4th day of May 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ F.A. Gossett, III
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?