Ury v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 34

ORDER granting Motion to Withdraw as Attorney 33 . IT IS ORDERED: The motion for leave to withdraw of William M. Lamson, Jr. and the law firm of Lamson, Dugan and Murray, LLP (Filing No. 33 ) as counsel for the defendant is granted. The Clerk of Court shall stop all electronic notices to William M. Lamson, Jr. and the law firm of Lamson, Dugan and Murray, LLP regarding this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)

-TDT Ury v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Doc. 34

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

RODNEY R. URY, Plaintiff, vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8:10CV116 ORDER

This matter is before the court on the motion for leave to withdraw of William M. Lamson, Jr. and the law firm of Lamson, Dugan and Murray, LLP (Filing No. 33), as counsel for the defendant. The court notes other counsel represents the defendant. See Filing No. 14 - Entry of Appearance. The court finds moving counsel has shown good cause for withdrawal as required under NEGenR 1.3(f). Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion for leave to withdraw of William M. Lamson, Jr. and the law firm

of Lamson, Dugan and Murray, LLP (Filing No. 33) as counsel for the defendant is granted. 2. The Clerk of Court shall stop all electronic notices to William M. Lamson, Jr.

and the law firm of Lamson, Dugan and Murray, LLP regarding this case.

DATED this 14th day of March, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com