Hollingsworth v. The Nebraska Food Bank Network, Inc.

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Order Setting Schedule for Progression of a Pro Se Case, 29 . Plaintiff was advised that failure to respond by February 7, 2011, would result in claims against Defendant being dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's directive, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs action is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JAB)

Download PDF
-PRSE Hollingsworth v. Nebraska Food Bank Network, Inc. Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MICHAEL HOLLINGSWORTH, Plaintiff, v. NEBRASKA FOOD BANK NETWORK, INC., The, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV121 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on its own motion. On January 3, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Compel Discovery, Brief in support of Motion, and Index in support of Motion (filing nos. 26, 27, and 28) in which Defendant sought to compel Plaintiff to respond to discovery requests. On January 18, 2011, the court granted Defendant's Motion and ordered that Plaintiff respond to Defendant's discovery requests by February 7, 2011. (Filing No. 29 at CM/ECF p. 1.) Plaintiff was advised that failure to respond by February 7, 2011, would result in claims against Defendant being dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (Id.) To date, Plaintiff has not responded to this court's order in any way. See, e.g., NECivR 36.1(c) (requiring a party responding to a request for admission to file a certificate of service upon serving answers or objections). Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's directive, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. March 9, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?