Campbell v. Issuewood et al

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time (filing no. 22 ) is granted. The Final Pretrial Conference will be held before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on April 7, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. The trial date will be set by the undersigned Magistrate Judge at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl Zwart to be held on April 7, 2011. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

Campbell v. Issuewood et al

Doc. 25

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARVIN DEWEY CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. ISSUEWOOD, unit manager, DAYHARST, casemanger, MINER, casemanger, and SMITH, casemanger, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV129

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time. (Filing No. 22.) In his Motion, Plaintiff requests an extension of the Deposition and Discovery Deadlines in this matter. (Id.) Defendants have not opposed Plaintiff's request. (See Docket Sheet.) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time (filing no. 22) is granted.

2. Deposition and discovery deadline. All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by November 22, 2010. All interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production or inspection, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be served on or before October 12, 2010. 3. Motions to compel discovery shall be filed on or before October 12,

2010. The parties must comply with the provisions of NECivR 7.0.1 before filing a motion to compel.

Dockets.Justia.com

4. Dispositive Motions. All dispositive motions shall be filed on or before December 22, 2010. The parties must comply with the provisions of NECivR 7.0.1 and NECivR 56.1 when filing summary judgment motions. 5. Pretrial Conference. a. Defense counsel will have the primary responsibility for drafting the Order on Final Pretrial Conference, pursuant to the format and requirements set out in NECivR 16.2(a)(2). The plaintiff will be responsible for cooperating in the preparation and signing of the final version of the Order. The Order should be submitted to the plaintiff and to any other parties by February 22, 2011. The plaintiff shall provide additions and/or proposed deletions to Defense counsel by March 8, 2011. Defense counsel shall submit the Proposed Order on Final Pretrial Conference to the court by no later than March 22, 2011. If a party proposes an addition or deletion which is not agreed to by all the other parties, that fact should be noted in the text of the document. The Proposed Order on Final Pretrial Conference must be signed by all pro se parties and by counsel for all represented parties. The Final Pretrial Conference will be held before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on April 7, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. Prior to the pretrial conference, all items as directed in NECivR 16.2 and full preparation shall have been completed so that trial may begin at any time following the Pretrial Conference.

b.

c.

If a plaintiff is held in an institution, the pretrial conference will 2

be by telephone. In that case, Defense counsel shall contact the plaintiff's institution in advance and arrange to initiate and place the conference call. 6. The trial date will be set by the undersigned Magistrate Judge at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference. 7. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl Zwart to be held on April 7, 2011. DATED this 1st day of September, 2010. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court. 3