San Juan v. First National Bank of Omaha

Filing 97

ORDER - The Defendant's Motion In Limine to Strike and Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Exhibit Nos. 47 and 48 and Related Testimony (Filing No. 83 ) is denied without prejudice. The Defendant's Second Motion In Limine to Strike and Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Exhibit Nos. 48 Through 55 and Related Testimony (Filing No. 92 ) is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LUIS EDUARDO SAN JUAN,
Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 8:10CV133

vs.
ORDER
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Strike and
Exclude Plaintiff’s Proposed Exhibit Nos. 47 and 48 and Related Testimony (Filing No.
83), and the Defendant’s Second Motion In Limine to Strike and Exclude Plaintiff’s
Proposed Exhibit Nos. 48 Through 55 and Related Testimony (Filing No. 92). The
Defendant has notified the Court that the above captioned case has settled. In light of
the parties’ settlement, the Motions will be denied, without prejudice.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Strike and Exclude Plaintiff’s Proposed
Exhibit Nos. 47 and 48 and Related Testimony (Filing No. 83) is denied
without prejudice; and
2. The Defendant’s Second Motion In Limine to Strike and Exclude Plaintiff’s
Proposed Exhibit Nos. 48 Through 55 and Related Testimony (Filing No. 92)
is denied without prejudice.
Dated this 13th day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge