Estate of David N. Osborne v. Limoges et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 16 Motion to Extend. The plaintiff shall have until November 12, 2010, to respond to the defendants' motion to dismiss 11 . The plaintiff shall initiate a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge within ten (10) business days following the court's ruling on the defendants' motion to dismiss. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)

Download PDF
-TDT Monahan v. Limoges et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMES H. MONAHAN, duly appointed personal representative of the ESTATE OF DAVID N. OSBORNE, Plaintiff, vs. DIANE LAMOGIS, ESTATE OF ELIZABETH OSBORNE, M. KATHLEEN BREWER, and JOHN AND JANE DOE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV164 ORDER This matter is before the court on the parties' separate reports pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) (Filing Nos. 14 and 15). The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss (Filing No. 11). The plaintiff moves for an enlargement of time to respond to the motion to dismiss and to permit discovery (Filing No. 16). Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion for enlargement of time to respond to the defendants' motion to dismiss (Filing No. 16) is granted. The plaintiff shall have until November 12, 2010, to respond to the defendants' motion to dismiss (Filing No. 11). In the meantime, the plaintiff may conduct discovery as it may relate to the motion to dismiss. Otherwise, discovery and further progression of this matter is stayed pending the ruling on the defendants' motion to dismiss. 2. The plaintiff shall initiate a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge within ten (10) business days following the court's ruling on the defendants' motion to dismiss. DATED this 10th day of September, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?