Exmark Manufacturing Company Inc. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Product Group

Filing 971

ORDER - The defendant's motion for approval of supersedeas bond and a stay of execution of the judgment (Filing No. 970 ) is granted. The supersedeas bond attached as Exhibit A to the motion (Filing No. 970 , Ex. A) is approved. Execution on the monetary judgment is stayed pending the appeal of the action. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA EXMARK MANUFACTURING Co., Inc., Plaintiff, 8:10CV187 v. ORDER BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on defendant’s unopposed motion for approval of supersedeas bond and stay of execution of judgment, Filing No. 970. A copy of the executed bond is attached to the motion as Exhibit A. The defendant represents to the Court that plaintiff Exmark Manufacturing Co., Inc. does not oppose this motion, and has agreed to both the form and amount of the bond. Under the Federal Rules, a party is entitled to a stay of a monetary judgment as a matter of right if a supersedeas bond is posted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that 1. The defendant’s motion for approval of supersedeas bond and a stay of execution of the judgment (Filing No. 970) is granted. 2. The supersedeas bond attached as Exhibit A to the motion (Filing No. 970, Ex. A) is approved. 3. Execution on the monetary judgment is stayed pending the appeal of the action. Dated this 16th day of August 2019. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?