Palomino-Duque v. Britten

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Answer to Complaint 20 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: On the court's own motion, Respondent shall have until March 25, 2011, to file the motion for post-conviction relief and the May 5, 2008, plea colloquy on which the Douglas County District Court's January 19, 2010, order is based, and also any other state court records relevant to the merits of Petitioner's allegations. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL)

Download PDF
-PRSE Palomino-Duque v. Britten Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA OSCAR A. PALOMINO-DUQUE, Petitioner, v. FRED BRITTEN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:10CV211 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on its own motion. Respondent has filed an Answer and Brief in this matter addressing the merits of Petitioner's allegations. (Filing No. 20 and 21.) However, Respondent did not support his Answer with the state court records relevant to the merits of Petitioner's claims. Specifically, in Respondent's Brief in support of Answer, Respondent asks this court to defer to the Douglas County District Court's January 19, 2010, order denying Petitioner post-conviction relief (see Filing No. 21 at CM/ECF pp. 10-13), however, Respondent failed to file the motion for post-conviction relief or the May 5, 2008, plea colloquy on which the district court's order is based. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: On the court's own motion, Respondent shall have until March 25, 2011, to file the motion for post-conviction relief and the May 5, 2008, plea colloquy on which the Douglas County District Court's January 19, 2010, order is based, and also any other state court records relevant to the merits of Petitioner's allegations. DATED this 4th day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?