Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1060
ORDER - the motion for leave to file documents as restricted access 1054 is granted. Its reply brief in support of its Daubert motion to strike the report and testimony of Prisms damages expert, Wayne Hoeberlein, and Exhibits B and 12-16 to the index of evidence in support of its brief shall remain as restricted access pending further order of the Court. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (AOA)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
McAFEE, INC.; SYMANTEC
)
CORPORATION; and TREND MICRO )
INCORPORATED,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
8:10CV220
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on defendant Symantec
Corporation’s motion for leave to file documents as restricted
access (Filing No. 1054).
granted.
The Court finds the motion should be
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file
documents as restricted access is granted.
Its reply brief in
support of its Daubert motion to strike the report and testimony
of Prism’s damages expert, Wayne Hoeberlein, and Exhibits B and
12-16 to the index of evidence in support of its brief shall
remain as restricted access pending further order of the Court.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?