Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1169
ORDER AND JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the memorandum opinion 1168 entered herein this date, the motions to stay of plaintiff Prism Technologies, LLC ("Prism") (Filing Nos. 1146 and 1158 ) are denied. On or before March 4, 2013, Prism may file a response to each defendant's bill of costs. On or before March 14, 2013, each defendant may file a reply to a response filed by Prism. Thereafter, the Clerk of Court will analyze each defendant's bill of costs and the parties' submissions and will tax costs as appropriate. Defendants' motion for attorney fees and nontaxable expenses (Filing No. 1137 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (AOA)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
McAFEE, INC.; SYMANTEC
)
CORPORATION; and TREND MICRO )
INCORPORATED,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
8:10CV220
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the memorandum opinion entered herein this
date,
1)
The motions to stay of plaintiff Prism
Technologies, LLC (“Prism”) (Filing Nos. 1146 and 1158) are
denied.
2)
On or before March 4, 2013, Prism may file a
response to each defendant’s bill of costs.
3)
On or before March 14, 2013, each defendant may
file a reply to a response filed by Prism.
4)
Thereafter, the Clerk of Court will analyze each
defendant’s bill of costs and the parties’ submissions and will
tax costs as appropriate.
5)
Defendants’ motion for attorney fees and nontaxable
expenses (Filing No. 1137) is denied.
DATED this 13th day of February, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?