Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 198

ORDER - Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing Schedule (Filing No. 189 ) is denied; A progression order setting forth the applicable deadlines will be entered; Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Reply Brief (Filing No. 192 ) is denied; and Defendants' reply brief has been filed and the Motion for Leave to File Reply (Filing No. 194 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TEL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, )
AUTODESK, INC.; McAFEE, INC.; )
NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
)
CORPORATION; SAGE SOFTWARE,
)
INC.; SYMANTEC CORPORATION;
)
THE MATHWORKS, INC.; and
)
TREND MICRO INCORPORATED,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)

8:10CV220

ORDER

This matter is before the Court following a conference
with counsel on July 21, 2011.

The Court finds the situation

mandates establishing deadlines for the progression of the
remainder of the case.

If defendants believe the case can be

resolved in light of the Court’s construction (Filing No. 188) of
the patent terms “hardware key” and “access key,” defendants are
invited to file a motion for summary judgment as soon as
possible.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing

Schedule (Filing No. 189) is denied;
2.

A progression order setting forth the applicable

deadlines will be entered;

3.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Reply Brief (Filing

No. 192) is denied; and
4.

Defendants’ reply brief has been filed and the

Motion for Leave to File Reply (Filing No. 194) is denied as
moot.
DATED this 22nd day of July, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court

-2-