Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
431
ORDER adopting 429 Stipulation - The stipulation is approved and adopted. The close of discovery is extended to May 14, 2012, as to discovery requests served by plaintiff on defendants Autodesk, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, McAfee, Inc., National Instruments Corporation, and Symantec Corporation. Autodesk, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, McAfee, Inc., National Instruments Corporation, and Symantec Corporation shall have until January 20, 2012, to produce the discovery ordered by the Court in its memorandum and order dated December 14, 2011 (Filing No. 410 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, )
AUTODESK, INC.; McAFEE, INC., )
NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
)
CORPORATION; SAGE SOFTWARE,
)
INC., SYMANTEC CORPORATION;
)
and TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, )
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
8:10CV220
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the joint
stipulation to amend progression order and memorandum and order
(Filing No. 429).
The Court finds the stipulation should be
approved and adopted.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) The stipulation is approved and adopted.
The close
of discovery is extended to May 14, 2012, as to discovery
requests served by plaintiff on defendants Autodesk, Inc., Adobe
Systems Incorporated, McAfee, Inc., National Instruments
Corporation, and Symantec Corporation.
2) Autodesk, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, McAfee,
Inc., National Instruments Corporation, and Symantec Corporation
shall have until January 20, 2012, to produce the discovery
ordered by the Court in its memorandum and order dated December
14, 2011 (Filing No. 410).
DATED this 6th day of January, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?