Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 431

ORDER adopting 429 Stipulation - The stipulation is approved and adopted. The close of discovery is extended to May 14, 2012, as to discovery requests served by plaintiff on defendants Autodesk, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, McAfee, Inc., National Instruments Corporation, and Symantec Corporation. Autodesk, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, McAfee, Inc., National Instruments Corporation, and Symantec Corporation shall have until January 20, 2012, to produce the discovery ordered by the Court in its memorandum and order dated December 14, 2011 (Filing No. 410 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TEL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ADOBE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, ) AUTODESK, INC.; McAFEE, INC., ) NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS ) CORPORATION; SAGE SOFTWARE, ) INC., SYMANTEC CORPORATION; ) and TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 8:10CV220 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the joint stipulation to amend progression order and memorandum and order (Filing No. 429). The Court finds the stipulation should be approved and adopted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The stipulation is approved and adopted. The close of discovery is extended to May 14, 2012, as to discovery requests served by plaintiff on defendants Autodesk, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, McAfee, Inc., National Instruments Corporation, and Symantec Corporation. 2) Autodesk, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, McAfee, Inc., National Instruments Corporation, and Symantec Corporation shall have until January 20, 2012, to produce the discovery ordered by the Court in its memorandum and order dated December 14, 2011 (Filing No. 410). DATED this 6th day of January, 2012. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?