Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 538

ORDER - Adobe shall file a brief opposing Prism's motion 528 on or before April 9, 2012, and Prism shall file a reply brief on or before April 16, 2012. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TEL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ADOBE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; ) AUTODESK, INC.; McAFEE, INC.; ) SYMANTEC CORPORATION; ) and ) TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 8:10CV220 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the “emergency motion” of plaintiff Prism Technologies, Inc. (“Prism”) “to preserve evidence and for sanctions” as to defendant Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Adobe”) (Filing No. 528). Prism filed an accompanying brief with indices of evidence (Filing Nos. 529531). One day later, Adobe filed an “objection to expedited review of Prism’s ‘emergency’ motion” (Filing No. 533), with accompanying index of evidence (Filing No. 534). After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Court finds that Prism’s motion cannot be adequately addressed without a full briefing of the issues raised therein. The Court will not issue an order in any “emergency” manner, but will wait until the issues are ripe for decision. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Adobe shall file a brief opposing Prism’s motion on or before April 9, 2012, and 2) Prism shall file a reply brief on or before April 16, 2012. DATED this 26th day of March, 2012. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?