Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
538
ORDER - Adobe shall file a brief opposing Prism's motion 528 on or before April 9, 2012, and Prism shall file a reply brief on or before April 16, 2012. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; )
AUTODESK, INC.; McAFEE, INC.; )
SYMANTEC CORPORATION;
)
and
)
TREND MICRO INCORPORATED,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
8:10CV220
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the “emergency
motion” of plaintiff Prism Technologies, Inc. (“Prism”) “to
preserve evidence and for sanctions” as to defendant Adobe
Systems Incorporated (“Adobe”) (Filing No. 528).
Prism filed an
accompanying brief with indices of evidence (Filing Nos. 529531).
One day later, Adobe filed an “objection to expedited
review of Prism’s ‘emergency’ motion” (Filing No. 533), with
accompanying index of evidence (Filing No. 534).
After reviewing
the parties’ submissions, the Court finds that Prism’s motion
cannot be adequately addressed without a full briefing of the
issues raised therein.
The Court will not issue an order in any
“emergency” manner, but will wait until the issues are ripe for
decision.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Adobe shall file a brief opposing Prism’s motion on
or before April 9, 2012, and
2)
Prism shall file a reply brief on or before April
16, 2012.
DATED this 26th day of March, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?