Prism Technologies v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 758

ORDER regarding Protective Order 390 - The Protective Order shall be revised, or the designated information must be stricken from plaintiff's expert reports. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TEL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ADOBE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; ) AUTODESK, INC.; McAFEE, INC.; ) SYMANTEC CORPORATION; ) and TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 8:10CV220 ORDER After reviewing Paragraph 8(c) of the Protective Order (Filing No. 390), it appears the co-defendants are precluded from access to the information relied upon by Prism’s expert in his report. It is inherently unreasonable to allow plaintiff access to information that defendants cannot access. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that either the Protective Order shall be revised, or the designated information must be stricken from plaintiff’s expert reports. DATED this 2nd day of July, 2012. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?