Langa v. Houston et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this memorandum and order.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TCL )

Download PDF
Langa v. Houston et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA WOPASHITWE MONDO EYEN WE LANGA, ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) V. ) ) ROBERT P. HOUSTON, Director of ) Nebraska Department of Correctional ) Services and, NEBRASKA BOARD ) OF PAROLE, The, and NEBRASKA ) BOARD OF PARDONS, The, ) ) Respondents. ) ) 8:10CV229 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Petitioner filed a successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 1) on June 18, 2010. At the time of filing, Petitioner had not obtained authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive petition as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). However, as of June 18, 2010, Petitioner had also filed a Petition for Permission to File a Successive Habeas Petition in the Eighth Circuit. On October 4, 2010, this court stayed this matter pending the Eighth Circuit's ruling on Petitioner's request to file a successive petition. (Filing 7.) On October 28, 2010, the Eighth Circuit denied Petitioner's request to file a successive petition. (Filing 8.) Accordingly, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 1) is an unauthorized successive petition and will be dismissed. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without Dockets.Justia.com prejudice. 2. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this memorandum and order. December 6, 2010. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?