Kelly v. Omaha Housing Authority
Filing
158
ORDER granting (156) Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis in case 8:10-cv-00245-JFB-TDT; granting (77) Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis in case 8:11-cv-00192-JFB-TDT. Member Cases: 8:10-cv-00245-JFB-TDT, 8:11-cv-00192-JFB-TDT. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BONNIE KELLY,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
OMAHA HOUSING AUTHORITY, and
)
STANLEY TIMM, Executive Director,
)
in his individual and official capacity,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
BONNIE KELLY,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HOUSING AUTHORITY of the CITY OF )
OMAHA, and STANLEY TIMM, Executive )
Director, in his individual and
)
official capacity,
)
)
Defendants.
)
8:10CV245
ORDER
8:11CV192
ORDER
This matter is before the court upon the plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to Appeal
In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 156 - 8:10CV245; Filing No. 77 - 8:11CV192) and the referral
of such motions to the undersigned magistrate judge (Filing No. 157 - 8:10CV245; Filing
No. 78 - 8:11CV192). The plaintiff filed an affidavit attesting to the plaintiff’s finances and
assets. See Filing No. 156 - 8:10CV245; Filing No. 77 - 8:11CV192. According to Fed. R.
App. P. 24(3), “[a] party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the districtcourt action . . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization, .
. . .” The court granted the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis in District Court
without prepaying fees or costs. See Filing No. 4 - 8:10CV245. The court has reviewed
the plaintiff’s affidavit and finds no evidence of bad faith. Therefore, the plaintiff may
proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.
IT IS ORDERED:
The plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 156 8:10CV245; Filing No. 77 - 8:11CV192) is granted.
DATED this 13th day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?