Melena v. Nanfito et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff shall have until 10/20/10 to apprise the court of her current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to set a pro se case management deadline for 10/20/2010: deadline for informing court of new address. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)

-PRSE Melena v. Nanfito et al

Doc. 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA AUDREY MELENA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GENOVIVE NANFITO, DAWN COFFEY, ) JACIE VICTOR, JOHN, EDNA, JOHN ) DOE, Omaha Police Officers, and JOHN ) DOE, Guardian Ad-Litem, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 8:10CV290

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On August 25, 2010, the Clerk of the court sent a Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff at her last known address. (Filing No. 5.) On August 30, 2010, it was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 6.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of her current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff's whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall have until October 20, 2010, to apprise the court of her current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 20, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address. DATED this 20th day of September, 2010. BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or W e b sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
o f Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they p r o v i d e on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their W e b sites. The c o u r t accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases t o work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

Dockets.Justia.com