Peetz v. Genentech, Inc. et al

Filing 98

ORDER - During today's conference call, the parties identified an ongoing disputed discovery issue. They have agreed upon a briefing schedule for submitting that issue for court resolution. 1) Genentech's anticipated motion to quash wit h supporting brief and evidence shall be filed on or before May 20, 2013.2) Plaintiff's response shall be filed by June 10, 2013.3) Any reply shall be filed on or before June 17, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JESSE PEETZ, Plaintiff, 8:10CV297 vs. ORDER GENENTECH, INC., a California corporation; BIOGEN IDEC, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; and DOES 125, residents of California; Defendants. During today's conference call, the parties identified an ongoing disputed discovery issue. They have agreed upon a briefing schedule for submitting that issue for court resolution. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Genentech's anticipated motion to quash with supporting brief and evidence shall be filed on or before May 20, 2013. 2) Plaintiff's response shall be filed by June 10, 2013. 3) Any reply shall be filed on or before June 17, 2013. Dated this 2nd day of May, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?