Peetz v. Genentech, Inc. et al
Filing
98
ORDER - During today's conference call, the parties identified an ongoing disputed discovery issue. They have agreed upon a briefing schedule for submitting that issue for court resolution. 1) Genentech's anticipated motion to quash wit h supporting brief and evidence shall be filed on or before May 20, 2013.2) Plaintiff's response shall be filed by June 10, 2013.3) Any reply shall be filed on or before June 17, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JESSE PEETZ,
Plaintiff,
8:10CV297
vs.
ORDER
GENENTECH, INC., a California
corporation; BIOGEN IDEC, INC., a
Massachusetts corporation; and DOES 125, residents of California;
Defendants.
During today's conference call, the parties identified an ongoing disputed
discovery issue. They have agreed upon a briefing schedule for submitting that issue for
court resolution. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Genentech's anticipated motion to quash with supporting brief and evidence
shall be filed on or before May 20, 2013.
2)
Plaintiff's response shall be filed by June 10, 2013.
3)
Any reply shall be filed on or before June 17, 2013.
Dated this 2nd day of May, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?