Wells v. Norfork Regenal Center

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until October 20, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 20, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

-PRSE Wells v. Norfork Regenal Center

Doc. 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MR. ROBIN O. WELLS, Plaintiff, V. NORFORK REGENAL CENTER, and or Hospital, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV301

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On September 3, 2010, the Clerk of the court sent a Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff at his last known address. (Filing No. 7.) On September 9, 2010, it was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 8.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff's whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall have until October 20, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 20, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address. DATED this 20th day of September, 2010.

Dockets.Justia.com

BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2