Stejskal v. Laphen

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Clerk of the court is directed to reassign this matter from United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf to Chief United States District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. The above-captioned case is removed from the pro se docket and the pro se staff shall have no further involvement in this matter. Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Judge Richard G. Kopf and Pro Se Docket no longer assigned to the case. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

-TDT Stejskal v. Laphen

Doc. 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DOUGLAS L. STEJSKAL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. LAPHEN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV332

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. The court has examined the record in this matter, including the Complaint. (Filing No. 1-1, Attach. 1.) The court finds that this matter and Case Nos. 8:10CV199 and 4:10CV3177 "involve some or all of the same issues of fact or arise out of the same transaction." NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C)(iii). Case Nos. 8:10CV199 and 4:10CV3177 are assigned to Chief United States District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the court is directed to reassign this matter from United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf to Chief United States District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. 2. The above-captioned case is removed from the pro se docket and the pro se staff shall have no further involvement in this matter. DATED this 22nd day of December, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or W e b sites. The U.S. District Court for the District o f Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they p r o v i d e on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their W e b sites. The c o u r t accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases t o work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Dockets.Justia.com