Melena v. Thomas et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the courts orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. All pending Motions are denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
-PRSE Melena v. Thomas et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA AUDREY MELENA, Pe titio n er, v. WADIE THOMAS, et al., Re spon den ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV337
M EM ORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. On September 20, 2010, the court entered a Memorandum and Order that directed Petitioner to apprise the court of her current address. (Filing No. 5.) In this Memorandum and Order, the court cautioned Petitioner that failure to apprise the court of her address by October 20, 2010, would result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. (Id.) Petitioner failed to respond. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. o r d e r s. 2. Ord er. 3. All pending Motions are denied. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the court's
DATED this 26th day of October, 2010. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?