John K. Cielinski v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al

Filing 92

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Werner Enterprises, Inc. shall file its motion for summary judgment on or before July 15, 2011. The plaintiff shall have to on or before August 15, 2011, to file a response to any motion for summary judgment previously filed a nd to file his motion for summary judgment. Werner Enterprises, Inc. may file a reply in support of its own summary judgment motion and a response to the plaintiff's summary judgment motion on or before August 31, 2011. The plaintiff may file a reply in support of his own summary judgment motion on or before September 12, 2011. Within ten days following the court's ruling on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment, the plaintiff shall arrange a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge for the purpose of scheduling the matter to conclusion. Deadlines/Hearings terminated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOHN K. CIELINSKI,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:10CV351
ORDER

This matter is before the court following a telephone conference with counsel on
May 25, 2011. Vincent M. Powers represented the plaintiff and Roger J. Miller and Abigail
M. Moland represented the defendant Werner Enterprises, Inc. During the discussion
counsel stated their belief the case may be resolved by cross motions for summary
judgment. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

Werner Enterprises, Inc. shall file its motion for summary judgment on or

before July 15, 2011.
2.

The plaintiff shall have to on or before August 15, 2011, to file a response

to any motion for summary judgment previously filed and to file his motion for summary
judgment.
3.

Werner Enterprises, Inc. may file a reply in support of its own summary

judgment motion and a response to the plaintiff’s summary judgment motion on or before
August 31, 2011.
4.

The plaintiff may file a reply in support of his own summary judgment motion

on or before September 12, 2011.
5.

Within ten days following the court’s ruling on the parties’ cross motions for

summary judgment, the plaintiff shall arrange a telephone conference with opposing
counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge for the purpose of scheduling the matter to
conclusion.
DATED this 25th day of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge