Bradley v. Kravosha et al

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed IFP on appeal and the appeal is dismissed. The Clerk of the court shall not process the appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Clerk of the court is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties and to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(TCL )

Download PDF
-PRSE Bradley v. Kravosha et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JUAN BRADLEY, Plaintiff, V. NORMAN KRAVOSHA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV359 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, filed on November 16, 2010. (Filing No. 11.) Plaintiff did not submit a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") on Appeal, and did not pay the $455.00 appellate filing fee. (See Docket Sheet; Filing No. 12.) The court has carefully reviewed the record and finds that the appeal cannot be processed. As the court previously informed Plaintiff, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), a prisoner may not proceed in forma pauperis in a civil action, or appeal a judgment in a civil action, if the prisoner has, on three or more occasions, while incarcerated, brought an action or appeal in federal court that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). An exception is made for prisoners who are under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Id. The court has already determined that Plaintiff brought the following four cases while incarcerated, all of which were dismissed as frivolous: Bradley v. Urbom, Case No. 8:92CV54 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on March 10, 1992. Bradley v. The Senate, Case No. 8:92CV96 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on May 7, 1992. Dockets.Justia.com Bradley v. U.S. District Court, Case No. 8:92CV127 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on March 13, 1992. Bradley v. Urbom, Case No. 8:92CV188 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on April 13, 1992. Plaintiff did not show that these cases were not dismissed as frivolous, nor did he show that he faces any danger of physical injury. Thus, Plaintiff was not permitted to proceed IFP in this court, and is not entitled to proceed IFP on appeal. Moreover, Plaintiff has not paid the $455.00 filing fee, and his appeal cannot be processed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed IFP on appeal and the appeal is dismissed. The Clerk of the court shall not process the appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties and to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. DATED this 2nd day of December, 2010. BY THE COURT: S/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?