Mitzel v. HSBC

Filing 26

ORDER upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on September 27, 2011 by counsel for both parties in their Stipulation 25 , which is hereby adopted. On or before October 12, 2011, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulat ion for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The planning conference report deadline is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 10/12/2011.)Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA EVELYN MITZEL f/k/a EVELYN FOX, Plaintiff, v. HSBC CARD SERVICES, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV392 ORDER Upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on September 27, 2011, by counsel for both parties in their Stipulation (Filing No. 25), which is hereby adopted, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. On or before October 12, 2011, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. 2. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. 3. The planning conference report deadline is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. DATED this 28th day of September, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?