American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company v. Dial Equities, Inc. et al

Filing 105

ORDER approving 103 Stipulation of Dismissal of Claims Against and By Defendants and Motion to Dismiss Defendants. American Guarantee's claims against Defendants in American Guarantees Amended Complaint (Filing No. 74 at pp. 1-8) are dismis sed with prejudice. Defendants' claims against Columbia Casualty in Defendants' Amended Third-Party Complaint 60 are dismissed with prejudice. Columbia Casualty's claims against Defendants in Columbia Casualty's Amended Answer and Counterclaim (Filing No. 62 at pp. 4-9) are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall pay its own costs. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND
LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, and
COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY,

CASE NO. 8:10CV424

Plaintiffs,
vs.

ORDER

DIAL EQUITIES, INC., KEY
ASSOCIATES LLC, and GRAND POINTE
- NE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal of Claims Against
and By Defendants and Motion to Dismiss Defendants (Filing No. 103) filed by Plaintiff
American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company (“American Guarantee”), Plaintiff
Columbia Casualty Company (“Columbia Casualty”), and Defendants Dial Equities, Inc.,
Key Associates LLC, and Grand Pointe – NE Limited Partnership (collectively,
“Defendants”). Having considered the stipulation and motion,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The Stipulation of Dismissal of Claims Against and By Defendants and

Motion to Dismiss Defendants (Filing No. 103) is approved;
2.

American

Guarantee’s

claims

against

Defendants

in

American

Guarantee’s Amended Complaint (Filing No. 74 at pp. 1-8) are dismissed with
prejudice 1;

1

American Guarantee has asserted a cross-claim against Columbia Casualty
(Filing No. 74 at pp. 8-16), which is not addressed by the present stipulation and motion.

3.

Defendants’ claims against Columbia Casualty in Defendants’ Amended

Third-Party Complaint (Filing No. 60) are dismissed with prejudice;
4.

Columbia Casualty’s claims against Defendants in Columbia Casualty’s

Amended Answer and Counterclaim (Filing No. 62 at pp. 4-9) are dismissed with
prejudice; and
5.

Each party shall pay its own costs.

Dated this 30th day of July, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

2