United States of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 42

ORDER - Before the court is a Notice of Related Case 3 filed on behalf of the plaintiff United States of America indicating that this case is related to six federal court cases filed in the District of Arizona, Southern District of California, and this district. The court notes that the Nebraska federal court case 8:08CV336 Union Pacific Railroad Company v. U.S.Department of Homeland Security has been consolidated with 8:10CV430 United States of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. The court finds this case, 8:10CV444, is related to consolidated cases 8:10CV430 and 8:08CV336. Further, the court refers the matter of whether this case should be consolidated with 8:10CV430 and 8:08CV336 to Magistrate Judge Thomas Thalken. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:10CV444 ORDER Before the court is a Notice of Related Case filed on behalf of the plaintiff United States of America indicating that this case is related to six federal court cases filed in the District of Arizona, Southern District of California, and this district. The court notes that the Nebraska federal court case 8:08CV336 Union Pacific Railroad Company v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security has been consolidated with 8:10CV430 United States of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. The court finds this case, 8:10CV444, is related to consolidated cases 8:10CV430 and 8:08CV336. Further, the court refers the matter of whether this case should be consolidated with 8:10CV430 and 8:08CV336 to Magistrate Judge Thomas Thalken. SO ORDERED. DATED this 30th day of November, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?