Ellis et al v. Houston et al

Filing 35

ORDER sustaining 34 Motion for Protective Order Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JARYL ELLIS, MICHAEL HUNTER, TIFFANY JOHNSON, and PAUL ZEIGER, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) ) ROBERT P. HOUSTON, Director of ) Nebraska Department of Correctional ) Services, all in their individual ) capacities and official capacities, ) FRANK HOPKINS, Deputy Director of ) Nebraska Department of Correctional ) Services, all in their individual ) capacities and official capacities, ) DENNIS BLAKEWELL, Warden of ) Nebraska State Penitentiary, all in their ) individual capacities and official ) capacities, CATHY SHEAIR, Associate ) Warden of Nebraska State Penitentiary, ) all in their individual capacities and ) official capacities, and JOSEPH ) STALEY, Associate Warden of ) Nebraska State Penitentiary, all in their ) individual capacities and official ) capacities, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 8:10CV3222 ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protection Order filed herein. (Filing No. 34) The Court, being fully advised in the premises, sustains the motion and orders as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS. Limitations under this Stipulated Protective Order on the use or disclosure of documents and information designated as confidential shall apply to (a) all information, copies, extracts and complete or partial summaries prepared or derived from such documents; and (b) portions of briefs, memoranda or any other writing filed with the Court and exhibits thereto which directly relate to any such information, documents, copies, extracts or summaries. 2. CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS/INFORMATION. Defendants seek to protect from disclosure certain confidential information and documents disclosed regarding this action that pertain to personnel files and disciplinary records of Defendants' employees. Said documents/information are hereby designated as confidential. Said documents/information will be retained by Plaintiffs' counsel and will not be used for any purpose other than this litigation and will not be disclosed except pursuant to court order entered after notice, to anyone except: a. Counsel who represent the parties to this action, employees of the Attorney General's office or the law firm of Plaintiffs' counsel, retained outside counsel of the parties, or any in house counsel, law clerks, secretaries or paralegals directly involved in the this litigation; b. Experts and consultants retained by a party to this action for purposes of assisting in the preparation or presentation of claims or defenses; c. Any trial witness, during the course of trial testimony, when necessary to the testimony of such witness; d. Any person who was involved in the preparation of the document; 2 e. f. 3. The Court, Court personnel, court reporters and similar personnel; and the named parties to this case. RETURN OF DOCUMENTS. Upon completion of this litigation, all documents and copies of the same designated as confidential shall be destroyed or returned to counsel for Defendants with a signed statement reflecting the disposition of the documents. This Order shall not terminate upon the conclusion of this action but shall continue until the further order of the Court or until the party claiming confidentiality has waived the same in writing. 4. USE OF DOCUMENTS. Said confidential documents shall not be used for any purpose except in connection with this pending litigation. 5. WAIVER. Any waiver under this Order must be made in writing. 6. ENFORCEMENT. Any party or person subject to the obligations and prohibitions of this Order who is determined by the Court to have violated its terms is subject to sanctions imposed by the Court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 21st day of April, 2011. BY THE COURT: S/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?