Bradley v. All United State Supreme Court Judges et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed IFP on appeal. The Clerk of the court is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties and to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party; Copy transmitted to the 8th Circuit electronically)(GJG)

Download PDF
-PRSE Bradley v. All United State Supreme Court Judges et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JUAN BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. ALL UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUDGES, and CLERKS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:11CV9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on its own motion. On March 2, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit remanded this case to this court for the limited purpose of determining Plaintiff's in forma pauperis ("IFP") status. (See Filing No. 16.) As set forth below, the court has carefully reviewed the record and finds that Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed IFP on appeal. Plaintiff did not submit a Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP on Appeal, nor has he paid the $455.00 appellate filing fee. As the court previously informed Plaintiff, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) (" 1915(g)"), a prisoner may not proceed IFP in a civil action, or appeal a judgment in a civil action, if the prisoner has, on three or more occasions, while incarcerated, brought an action or appeal in federal court that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 1915(g). An exception is made for prisoners who are under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Id. The court has already determined that Plaintiff brought the following four cases while incarcerated, all of which were dismissed as frivolous: Bradley v. Urbom, No.8:92CV54 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on March 10, 1992. Dockets.Justia.com Bradley v. The Senate, No. 8:92CV96 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on May 7, 1992. Bradley v. U.S. District Court, No. 8:92CV127 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on March 13, 1992. Bradley v. Urbom, No. 8:92CV188 (D. Neb.), dismissed as frivolous on April 13, 1992. Plaintiff has not shown that these cases are not frivolous, nor has he shown that he faces any danger of physical injury. Thus, Plaintiff was not permitted to proceed IFP in this court, and is not entitled to proceed IFP on appeal. Moreover, Plaintiff has not paid the $455.00 filing fee. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed IFP on appeal. 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties and to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. DATED this 9th day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?