Ondris v. B&T Financial Services, LLC

Filing 18

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Betty Ondris is hereby considered proceeding pro se and counsel for the defendant may communicate with the plaintiff directly regarding this case. The Clerk of Court shall reassign this case to th e pro se docket in accordance with General Order No. 2007-13. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the plaintiff at her last known address. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party) (TEL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BETTY ONDRIS, Plaintiff, vs. B&T FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:11CV70 ORDER This matter is before the court on the motion of Michael S. Agruss and the law firm of Krohn & Moss, LTD (Filing No. 14) to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff Betty Ondris. Moving counsel states he and Ms. Ondris have irreconcilable differences which make it impossible for him to effectively represent her in this action. See Filing No. 14. Moving counsel served a copy of the motion on Ms. Ondris. Id. The court allowed the plaintiff an opportunity to respond to counsel’s motion. The plaintiff did not file any response or objection. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion of Michael S. Agruss and the law firm of Krohn & Moss, LTD (Filing No. 14) is granted. 2. Betty Ondris is hereby considered proceeding pro se and counsel for the defendant may communicate with the plaintiff directly regarding this case. 3. The Clerk of Court shall reassign this case to the pro se docket in accordance with General Order No. 2007-13. 4. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the plaintiff at her last known address: Betty Ondris 2205 SW 10th Street Omaha, NE 68108 Dated this 19th day of September, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?