Ondris v. B&T Financial Services, LLC
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER pursuant to Memorandum and Order 20 . This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party) (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BETTY ONDRIS,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
B&T FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC,
Defendant.
8:11CV70
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. On October 26, 2011, the court entered a
Memorandum and Order that required Plaintiff to “file a status report or show cause why this case
should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute” by November 11, 2011. (Filing No. 20 at CM/ECF
p. 1.) Plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s Memorandum and Order, and the time in
which to do so has now passed. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this
matter diligently and failed to comply with this court’s orders.
2.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order.
DATED this 2 nd day of December, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Chief United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for
the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services
or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third
parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect
the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?