Home Instead v. Boyce et al

Filing 70

ORDER denying without prejudice to reassertion at a later time the Plaintiff's 69 Motion for Extension of Progression Order Deadlines. By or before December 20, 2012, the parties shall jointly submit to the Court a proposed progression schedule for this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HOME INSTEAD, Inc., a Nebraska
corporation,
Plaintiff,
V.
MERLE BOYCE, an individual,
CHARLES BOYCE JR., an
individual, and BOYCE
ENTERPRISES,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:11CV86

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting that the Court temporarily extend the deadlines
set forth in the Progression Order (filing 62) by sixty days and schedule a telephonic hearing
to discuss and set progression deadlines. (Filing 69.) Defendants have not objected to
Plaintiff’s motion.
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of deadlines and request for a telephonic hearing
will be denied. However, the Court will order the parties to confer and jointly submit to the
Court a proposed, revised progression schedule.1 If the parties are unable to reach an
agreement with respect to progression deadlines, Plaintiff may renew its motion for extension
of time and request for a telephone conference.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

1

Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Progression Order Deadlines (filing 69) is
denied without prejudice to reassertion at a later time.

The Court recognizes that the deadline for Plaintiff to disclose its expert witnesses
was December 3, 2012. However, given Plaintiff’s motion, the proposed progression
schedule may include a revised deadline for Plaintiff’s expert disclosures.

2.

By or before December 20, 2012, the parties shall jointly submit to the Court
a proposed progression schedule for this case.

DATED December 6, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
S/ F.A. Gossett
United States Magistrate Judge

2