Brodzki v. State of Nebraska

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Petitioner's Objection (filing no. 9 ), which the court liberally construes as a Motion to Reconsider. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ANTHONY J. BRODZKI,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:11CV91

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Objection, which the court
liberally construes as a Motion to Reconsider. (Filing No. 9.) In Plaintiff’s Motion,
he asks the court to reconsider its June 23, 2011, Memorandum and Order (filing no.
7), which dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice. The court has carefully
reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion and finds no good cause to reconsider any portion of its
June 23, 2011, Memorandum and Order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Objection (filing no. 9),
which the court liberally construes as a Motion to Reconsider, is denied.
DATED this 24th day of August, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for
the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services
or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third
parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect
the opinion of the court.