Andersen v. Midland Lutheran College
Filing
40
ORDER - The remaining deadlines set in the October 17, 2011, progression order(Filing No. 23 ) are terminated. No conference will be held on May 18, 2012, and trial is canceled. The parties shall have to on or before June 15, 2012, to file any mo tions for summary judgment. The parties shall have seven (7) business days from the date the court rules on any motion for summary judgment, in which to schedule a telephone planning conference with the court, if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiff shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule the telephone planning conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HANS HAROLD ANDERSEN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MIDLAND LUTHERAN COLLEGE,
n/k/a MIDLAND UNIVERSITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:11CV93
ORDER
This matter comes before the court after a telephone conference with counsel for
the parties on April 11, 2012. Jeffrey A. Wagner represented the plaintiff and Craig F.
Martin represented the defendant. For the reasons discussed during the conference,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The remaining deadlines set in the October 17, 2011, progression order
(Filing No. 23) are terminated. No conference will be held on May 18, 2012, and trial is
canceled.
2.
The parties shall have to on or before June 15, 2012, to file any motions for
summary judgment.
3.
The parties shall have seven (7) business days from the date the court rules
on any motion for summary judgment, in which to schedule a telephone planning
conference with the court, if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiff shall contact the chambers
of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule the telephone
planning conference.
DATED this 11th day of April, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?