Andersen v. Midland Lutheran College
Filing
72
ORDER on the parties' objections to testimony Nancy Harms, Ph.D., gave during her deposition on January 13, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (BJC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HANS HAROLD ANDERSEN,
Plaintiff,
8:11CV93
vs.
ORDER
MIDLAND LUTHERAN COLLEGE,
n/k/a MIDLAND UNIVERSITY,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ objections to testimony Nancy
Harms, Ph.D., gave during her deposition on January 13, 2013. The court makes the
following rulings on the parties’ objections and the parties shall make the redactions in
the videotape deposition set forth below:
Page: Line
59: 9
71: 5
71: 19
72: 5
72: 24
73: 23
85: 13
86: 4
88: 4
Objection
Court’s Ruling
Improper
questioning of the
witness
from
a
deposition
Hearsay; move to
strike
Hearsay; foundation
Hearsay; foundation
Hearsay; foundation
Narrative
Overruled
Redaction
(page: line)
59: 9-11
Overruled
71: 5-6, 8-9
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
Sustained
71: 19-20
72: 5-6
72: 24-25
73: 21 starting at
“first of all”-25
85: 13, 15
86: 4-5
88: 1-2, 4-13
Hearsay; foundation
Hearsay; foundation
Hearsay;
foundation; move to
strike
Hearsay; foundation
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
91: 9
Hearsay;
foundation; move to
strike
Hearsay; foundation
Sustained
93: 5
Foundation
Overruled
88: 24
89: 25
Overruled
88: 23-25
89: 1-2
89: 23, 25
90: 1-5
91: 9-25
92: 1-7
93: 5-6
93: 11
94: 17
94: 24
95: 9, 11
95: 18
96: 8
96: 16
96: 20
96: 23
Foundation
Relevance
Hearsay; foundation
Hearsay; foundation
Hearsay;
foundation; move to
strike
Relevance
Relevance
Relevance
Hearsay;
foundation, move to
strike
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
93: 11-12
94: 16-18
94: 24-25
95: 9, 11
95: 18-19
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
Overruled
96: 8, 10
96: 16
96: 20
96: 23-24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 8th day of February, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?