Andersen v. Midland Lutheran College

Filing 72

ORDER on the parties' objections to testimony Nancy Harms, Ph.D., gave during her deposition on January 13, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (BJC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA HANS HAROLD ANDERSEN, Plaintiff, 8:11CV93 vs. ORDER MIDLAND LUTHERAN COLLEGE, n/k/a MIDLAND UNIVERSITY, Defendant. This matter is before the court on the parties’ objections to testimony Nancy Harms, Ph.D., gave during her deposition on January 13, 2013. The court makes the following rulings on the parties’ objections and the parties shall make the redactions in the videotape deposition set forth below: Page: Line 59: 9 71: 5 71: 19 72: 5 72: 24 73: 23 85: 13 86: 4 88: 4 Objection Court’s Ruling Improper questioning of the witness from a deposition Hearsay; move to strike Hearsay; foundation Hearsay; foundation Hearsay; foundation Narrative Overruled Redaction (page: line) 59: 9-11 Overruled 71: 5-6, 8-9 Overruled Overruled Overruled Sustained 71: 19-20 72: 5-6 72: 24-25 73: 21 starting at “first of all”-25 85: 13, 15 86: 4-5 88: 1-2, 4-13 Hearsay; foundation Hearsay; foundation Hearsay; foundation; move to strike Hearsay; foundation Overruled Overruled Overruled Overruled 91: 9 Hearsay; foundation; move to strike Hearsay; foundation Sustained 93: 5 Foundation Overruled 88: 24 89: 25 Overruled 88: 23-25 89: 1-2 89: 23, 25 90: 1-5 91: 9-25 92: 1-7 93: 5-6 93: 11 94: 17 94: 24 95: 9, 11 95: 18 96: 8 96: 16 96: 20 96: 23 Foundation Relevance Hearsay; foundation Hearsay; foundation Hearsay; foundation; move to strike Relevance Relevance Relevance Hearsay; foundation, move to strike Overruled Overruled Overruled Overruled Overruled 93: 11-12 94: 16-18 94: 24-25 95: 9, 11 95: 18-19 Overruled Overruled Overruled Overruled 96: 8, 10 96: 16 96: 20 96: 23-24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 8th day of February, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?