Womack v. McKernan et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have until June 20, 2011, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk o f the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 20, 2011: deadline to inform court of new address. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: (Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 6/20/2011.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
GEOFFREY LEWIS WOMACK,
Plaintiff,
v.
PATRICK J. MCKERNAN, REY
RIOS, and MIKE KING,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:11CV97

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On May 16, 2011, the Clerk
of the court sent a copy of the court’s previous Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff
at his last known address. (Filing No. 9.) On May 20, 2011, that document was
returned to the court as “Undeliverable,” and no forwarding information was
provided. (Filing No. 10.)
Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at
all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules
and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be
prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff shall have until June 20, 2011, to apprise the court of his
current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice
and without further notice.

2.
The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: June 20, 2011: deadline to inform court
of new address.
DATED this 23rd day of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2