Patterson v. City of Omaha, et al

Filing 28

ORDER that defendants shall, on or before February 10, 2012, file a response to plaintiff's MOTION to Extend Progression Order Deadlines 26 explaining why they have not responded to plaintiffs requestsfor discovery. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
TYRONE PATTERSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF OMAHA, a political
)
subdivision of the State of
)
Nebraska; MOLLY HIATT, both
)
individually and officially
)
as an officer of the Omaha
)
Police Department, and PAUL
)
HASIAK, both individually and )
officially as an officer of
)
the Omaha Police Department, )
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)

8:11CV128

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the motion to extend
progression order deadlines (Filing No. 26).

Having reviewed the

index of evidence in support of the motion (Filing No. 27), the
Court finds defendants should furnish an explanation as to their
conduct in connection with discovery matters identified by the
plaintiff’s motion.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants shall, on or before
February 10, 2012, file a response to plaintiff’s motion
explaining why they have not responded to plaintiff’s requests
for discovery.
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court