Roberts v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 182

ORDER to Withdraw Exhibits or Show Cause Why Exhibits Should Not Be Destroyed regarding plaintiff's exhibits from trial held February 9-13, 2015. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DAVID ROBERTS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF OMAHA Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 8:11CV129 ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), counsel for the plaintiff shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed: Plaintiff’s Exhibit Nos. 1A, 2, 3, 4A, 5-10, 14-15, 17, 19, 22, 25-27, 32, 34-37, 39, 41-43, 46, 48, 49-51, 53-56, 59-64, 66, 69, 72, 74, 76, 78-84, 88, 93, 97-101, 104-107, 113, 117, 119, 123, 135, 138, 140-142, 144, 150-151, 164, 164A, 167A, 169, 171-172, Jury Trial – February 9-13, 2015 If counsel fails to withdraw these exhibits as directed or to show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerk=s office is directed to destroy the listed exhibits without further notice to the parties or order from the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of December, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge Exhibits-Order_to_Withdraw_or_OSC_Destroy_Appeal_Time_Expired.docx Approved 12/22/14

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?