Roberts v. City of Omaha et al
Filing
182
ORDER to Withdraw Exhibits or Show Cause Why Exhibits Should Not Be Destroyed regarding plaintiff's exhibits from trial held February 9-13, 2015. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DAVID ROBERTS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF OMAHA
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: 8:11CV129
ORDER TO WITHDRAW
EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS
SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED
Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), counsel for the plaintiff shall
either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14
calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be
destroyed:
Plaintiff’s Exhibit Nos. 1A, 2, 3, 4A, 5-10, 14-15, 17, 19, 22, 25-27, 32, 34-37, 39,
41-43, 46, 48, 49-51, 53-56, 59-64, 66, 69, 72, 74, 76, 78-84, 88, 93, 97-101, 104-107,
113, 117, 119, 123, 135, 138, 140-142, 144, 150-151, 164, 164A, 167A, 169, 171-172, Jury Trial – February 9-13, 2015
If counsel fails to withdraw these exhibits as directed or to show cause why the
exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerk=s office is directed to destroy the listed exhibits
without further notice to the parties or order from the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 9th day of December, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
Exhibits-Order_to_Withdraw_or_OSC_Destroy_Appeal_Time_Expired.docx
Approved 12/22/14
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?