Bass v. Roberts Dairy

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 41 Motion to Continue Pretrial order Deadlines. The Final Pretrial Conference, scheduled for September 6, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., is cancelled. The parties are also relieved from all obligations relating to preparation of the Order on Final Pretrial Conference, pending resolution of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment; and The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Magistrate Judge Zwart. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CARL BASS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERTS DAIRY COMPANY, LLC,
Defendant.

CASE NO. 8:11CV146

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Continue Pretrial Order
Deadlines. (Filing No. 41.) In its Motion, Defendant requests that the Final Pretrial
Conference, and all associated dates, be postponed until after the resolution of the
pending Motion for Summary Judgment. (Id.) For good cause shown, the Motion is
granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s Motion to Continue Pretrial Order Deadlines (Filing No. 41) is
granted;

2.

The Final Pretrial Conference, scheduled for September 6, 2012, at 10:00
a.m., is cancelled. The parties are also relieved from all obligations relating
to preparation of the Order on Final Pretrial Conference, pending resolution
of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and

3.

The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and
Order to Magistrate Judge Zwart.

DATED this 19th day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites.

The U.S. District
Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third
parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no
agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility
for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work
or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.