SJT Development, Inc. et al v. Reiger et al

Filing 40

ORDER - Plaintiffs are given until July 19, 2011, to obtain new counsel in this matter. All proceedings in this case are stayed until said date. The court will proceed to rule on pending motions, including Plaintiffs' counsel's motion to withdraw (filing 37 ), following the expiration of the stay. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SJT DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Nevada Corporation, and SANDRA M. TRIANTAFILLOS, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) ) RACHEL L. RIEGER, DAVID L. ) RIEGER, DEANA M. GUHDE, ) DAVID F. GUHDE, MATTHEW ) WILSON, ENDEAVOR ) DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT ) GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation, ) JOHN REYES, JEFFREY KINNICK, ) JAMES VEGA, JOHN DOES I-V, ) real names unknown, LEVEL ONE ) FINANCIAL, INC., a California ) Corporation, STAR CAPITAL ) CORPORATION, a Delaware ) Corporation, SILVER HILL ) FINANCIAL, LLC, a Delaware ) Limited Liability Company, ) WACHOVIA BANK, NA, JOHN L. ) BERNARD, IB PROPERTY ) HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware ) Limited Liability Company, RANDY ) BENNETT, and BAYVIEW LOAN ) SERVICING, LLC, a Delaware ) Limited Liability Company, ) 8:11CV179 ORDER Defendants. Plaintiffs’ counsel has filed a motion to withdraw (filing 37). Having considered the motion, as well as the status of this proceeding, the court concludes that counsel’s motion will be granted, subject, however, to Plaintiffs’ retention of new representation. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiffs are given until July 19, 2011, to obtain new counsel in this matter. All proceedings in this case are stayed until said date. The court will proceed to rule on pending motions, including Plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion to withdraw (filing 37), following the expiration of the stay. July 5, 2011. BY THE COURT: S/ F.A. Gossett United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?