U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Arrington et al
Filing
121
ORDER regarding Motion for Show Cause Hearing filing 118 . IT IS ORDERED that by or before August 9, 2013, Defendant Michael Welke shall submit a report to the Court showing cause as to why he should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with the subpoena served upon him on April 16, 2013. Welke shall further show cause as to why he should not be compelled to appear for a deposition to provide all responsive documents. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES
TRADING COMMISSION,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
V.
)
)
JONATHAN W. ARRINGTON,
)
ELITE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS )
CORP., MJM ENTERPRISES LLC,
)
MICHAEL B. KRATVILLE, and
)
MICHAEL J. WELKE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
8:11CV181
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Michael Kratville’s (“Kratville”) Motion
for Show Cause Hearing and Application for Contempt. (Filing 118.) Kratville contends
that Defendant Michael Welke (“Welke”) was served with a valid subpoena for production
of documents on April 16, 2013, but has not provided any of the requested documents.
Kratville seeks an order compelling Welke to appear before the Court at a hearing to show
cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to obey the subpoena and compelling
Welke to appear for a deposition to provide all responsive documents. Having considered
the matter,
IT IS ORDERED that by or before August 9, 2013, Defendant Michael Welke shall
submit a report to the Court showing cause as to why he should not be held in contempt for
failing to comply with the subpoena served upon him on April 16, 2013. Welke shall further
show cause as to why he should not be compelled to appear for a deposition to provide all
responsive documents.
DATED July 9, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
S/ F.A. Gossett
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?