Barta v. Farm Service Agency et al

Filing 64

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 60 Motion to Strike and Motions to Quash 61 , 62 , and 63 are granted; and The Clerk of the court is directed not to process the summons forms contained in Plaintiff's Notice of Summons 59 . All other relief requested by Plaintiff in the Notice of Summons is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DALE LEIGHTON BARTA,
Plaintiff,
v.
FARM SERVICE AGENCY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 8:11CV198

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Filing No. 60) and
Motions to Quash (Filing Nos. 61, 62, and 63). The court granted Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss, dismissing this matter without prejudice, on December 20, 2011. (Filing No. 51.)
On that same date, the court entered Judgment in favor of Defendants. (Filing No. 52.)
Plaintiff thereafter filed several summons forms, which the Clerk of the court docketed as
a Notice of Summons. (Filing No. 59.) Defendants seek to quash these summonses
because the court has already entered judgment against Plaintiff and he is therefore not
entitled to any relief. The court agrees that the summons forms should not be issued in
light of the dismissal of this matter.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Filing No. 60) and Motions to Quash (Filing
Nos. 61, 62, and 63) are granted; and

2.

The Clerk of the court is directed not to process the summons forms
contained in Plaintiff’s Notice of Summons (Filing No. 59.) All other relief
requested by Plaintiff in the Notice of Summons is denied.

DATED this 13th day of April, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District
Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third
parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no
agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility
for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work
or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.