Glass v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 78

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 69 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. The court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff's Motion and finds no good cause to reconsider its August 11, 2011, Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LEOURIETA B. GLASS,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:11CV211

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider. (Filing No.
69.) In her Motion, Plaintiff asks the court to reconsider its August 11, 2011,
Memorandum and Order, in which it denied Plaintiff’s “Emergency Petition for
Extraordinary Relief [and] Writ of Prohibition [and] Writ of Mandamus [and] Request
for Stay of Enforcement of Sale and Eviction.” (See Filing No. 57.) The court has
carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion and finds no good cause to reconsider its
August 11, 2011, Memorandum and Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that
Petitioner’s Motion to Reconsider (filing no. 69) is denied.
DATED this 24th day of August, 2011.
BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or W eb sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their W eb sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.