Erickson v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc. et al

Filing 111

ORDER - The defendants Motion for an Extension of Time (Filing No. 108 ) is granted to the extent the Order Approving Post Settlement Deadlines (Filing No. 107 ) is amended so that class notices shall be sent by first class U.S. Mail to all clas s members by the defendants or their designee on or before November 12, 2012, except that already determined notifications shall be provided to the class administrator for immediate notice. The remaining deadlines set forth in paragraphs three and four in the Order Approving Post Settlement Deadlines (Filing No. 107) shall remain unchanged. The plaintiffs Objection to the Defendants Motion for an Extension of Time (Filing No. 109 ) is denied to the extent set forth herein. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
WILLIAM P. ERICKSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CREDIT BUREAU SERVICES, INC.,
DANIEL A. MARTIN, and
C.J. TIGHE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:11CV215
ORDER

This matter is before the court on the defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time
(Filing No. 108) and plaintiff’s Objection to the Defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time
(Filing No. 109). The court held a telephone conference on October 29, 2012. Pamela A.
Car represented the plaintiff and Douglas E. Quinn represented the defendants. Following
a discussion with counsel,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time (Filing No. 108) is granted

to the extent the Order Approving Post Settlement Deadlines (Filing No. 107) is amended
so that class notices shall be sent by first class U.S. Mail to all class members by the
defendants or their designee on or before November 12, 2012, except that already
determined notifications shall be provided to the class administrator for immediate notice.
2.

The remaining deadlines set forth in paragraphs three and four in the Order

Approving Post Settlement Deadlines (Filing No. 107) shall remain unchanged.
3.

The plaintiff’s Objection to the Defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time

(Filing No. 109) is denied to the extent set forth herein.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge