Poe v. U.S. Postal Service
Filing
38
ORDER - On or before May 1, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft ord er which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this cas e (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The pretrial conference and trial previously scheduled are cancelled upon therepresentation that this case is settled. (Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 5/1/2012.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SHERRY POE,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:11CV222
ORDER
Upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on March 13, 2012, by
counsel for both parties,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
On or before May 1, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint
stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable
Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose
of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice.
2.
Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and
the like) may be dismissed without further notice.
3.
The pretrial conference and trial previously scheduled are cancelled upon the
representation that this case is settled.
DATED this 13th day of March, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?