Stalp et al v. Excellus Health Plan, Inc.
Filing
15
ORDER following a telephone conference with counsel on February 3, 2012. The defendant shall file its motion for partial summary judgment on or before March 1, 2012. The plaintiffs shall have to on or before March 23, 2012, to file a response to the motion for partial summary judgment. The defendant may file a reply in support of its motion on or before April 2, 2012. Within ten days following the courts ruling on the motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff shall arrange a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge for the purpose of scheduling the matter to conclusion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CHRISTOPHER STALP, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
EXCELLUS HEALTH PLAN, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:11CV226
ORDER
This matter is before the court following a telephone conference with counsel on
February 3, 2012. Raymond R. Aranza represented the plaintiffs and Erin E. Busch
represented the defendant. During the discussion counsel stated their belief the case may
be resolved, in part by a motion for partial summary judgment. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The defendant shall file its motion for partial summary judgment on or before
March 1, 2012.
2.
The plaintiffs shall have to on or before March 23, 2012, to file a response
to the motion for partial summary judgment.
3.
The defendant may file a reply in support of its motion on or before April 2,
4.
Within ten days following the court’s ruling on the motion for summary
2012.
judgment, the plaintiff shall arrange a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the
undersigned magistrate judge for the purpose of scheduling the matter to conclusion.
DATED this 3rd day of February, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?